I hope you have a good holiday and a peaceful 2017
Wednesday, 21 December 2016
Tuesday, 20 December 2016
thelookofscience
I've
been fascinated by the imagery created within the various practical's - the
idea of what science looks like has been at the front of my mind. The machinery
used to create the look of science is often complex and huge! It
appears that there is a correlation between the object observed and the machinery used,
the smaller the material, the bigger the machine. I've been working on a series of images
that have been informed by the experience of observing the Electron Microscopes
and the images they create. Calibration often takes time and the images created
are the evidence of existence so using Photoshop I have been thinking about and
working with ideas such as alignment, shadow, opposites and presence. Next stage is to
work with the moving images created using light and reflective surfaces.
Thursday, 15 December 2016
newfilmsonscreens
It
was exciting to arrive in the Maxwell Centre yesterday to see the new films on the
screens. They look great - for me they give a sense of transition - three have been loaded - they are 'what inspired me to work with NanoDTC' - an early folded
structure - 'my initial work on the project' - a film with sci-fi tendencies'
and a starting point for a body of work' - the hands. to see the work in full https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MMQyR2KLns&feature=youtu.be it has Esther Morgan reading Industrian Light and Magic a poem she wrote in response to a conversation we had about me explaining death and the force #starwars to my eldest child.
Wednesday, 14 December 2016
gloveboxmadness
A fantastic session with the glove box today......for
the experiment I had made a number of very specific structural objects in terms
of their mechanics but more importantly in terms of the materials used. This is
so that they can be operated within the narrow restrictive parameters of the
glove box - one of the very specific spaces in which science is undertaken. The
gas in a glovebox is pumped through a series of treatment devices which remove solvents, water and oxygen from
the gas. Oxygen is removed by passing a hydrogen/nitrogen mixture
through copper metal while it is heated: the water formed is passed
out of the box with the excess hydrogen and nitrogen so I had to make devices
that take this issue on board. A sideways thought - the idea of evidence of
activity - documenting the other - it might be interesting in some way to look at the trace materials
extracted that is sucked off and out of the materials and held in the
suspension.
Monday, 12 December 2016
constraintcontrolandorder
I've been
looking at the movements used by the demonstrators when explaining various processes
and techniques related to science, trying to isolate the specific and
particular. They have been the starting point to create a number of new structures, these explore ideas
around constraint, control, and order. Also the making and activating of very
particular spaces, the specifics of non resonance shapes, particularly
pentagons and the generality of the question what does science look like? Meanwhile I appear to of
created a very specific structure recognised by chemists as dewar benzene. Apparently
the structure has a very particular functionality.
Saturday, 10 December 2016
isitfinishedisitart?
A wonderful conversation about art around knowing what to do as there appears to be no right answer..... when
asked how do you know that it's right? I had to think about an issue that I
take for granted - the assume assumed knowledge of 'finishedness'. The answer It
just feels like it felt wrong within the empirical context of science, the
question required something more solid - the role of intention and experience
and referencing examples of previous works, both your own and others became a
part of the equation/conversation. The idea of faith and belief, of working
within one's own knowledge bank was discussed as part of both a negative and
positive part of the search for a balanced algebraic equation around when
something was art. How a well constructed argument can become the fact, how
depending who is saying it determines its truthfulness or at the very least it's
value - the role of hierarchy and doctrines circled. Of course much of this has
its parallel within the science world as I have witnessed within the practical's
when anomalies within images have been dismissed - is this the same
thing.....maybe?
Friday, 9 December 2016
magicscienceconversation
a day in
Cambridge - but before arriving it required some planning - I am beginning to
make connections with individuals - the process of collaboration is always
interesting - what is possible, what is wanted and what is offered ... I
realise that I am in other peoples busy spaces, infiltrating, so am trying to request
and connect, whilst being hyper accommodating
and creating minimum fuss. A meeting with a possible 'real use' for my folding
structures, developing the idea of touch and connectivity through conductivity
and circuits......watch this space. I've made a number of new structures
inspired by the hand gestures that I have witnessed. These are made of many 'harmful'
materials (dust) so I filmed them within the space outside the clean room,
although its proximity to the room still required care. This went well with
some excellent images both still and moving. I feel I have created so much data
from the session which I now have to look through to determine the next steps. It's
always interesting to see what others do with the structures I make and there
were a couple of moments of magic - especially explaining a 'science' idea
whilst holding a non related structure - a form of meta moving sculpture communication
- art/science squared. I also had a meeting to discuss placing my work in a
glove box so I had made a number of structures that have non-invasive properties,
basically fibre and moisture free. The rubber, metal and plastic pieces refer
in colour, texture and in some cases material to the experience of the glove
box itself. Obvious I guess as I was working within a limited material palette
and parameters but not at the time of making - apart from the oppressive black
rubber piece. I've agreed and arranged a time next week to do this - very
exciting.....
Tuesday, 6 December 2016
beliefisall
a day in the studio
- working on a number of strands - the images for the NanoDTC website, the
design for the poster/exhibitions, creating a number of short films using
light/lazers and then reflecting on the surfaces I created in the last session in the studio and bringing together the
various elements through folding.
Friday, 2 December 2016
surfacesaregood
A busy day in
the studio cutting, folding and bonding - really pleased with the surfaces and
now looking forward to seeing them manipulated in the hand. The circles are just the beginnings of ideas around location, light and looking. Mainly inspired by the act of looking through various microscopes over the past month
Sunday, 27 November 2016
plannedhappenstance
Friday saw a morning of probing at a probe station, a
tool within a sealed box within a room. The idea of trying to manipulate and
measure with rules and laws to the fore, scraping off polymers to reach gold,
to test voltage, checking resistances and marvelling at how the small (the very
small, it always is) differences in the thickness of the polymer results in a
range of colours that relate to light waves....
I gave a short presentation to share initial thoughts and
some ideas I have been working on - a mini 'this is what I've been up to' presentation
- I have slotted in youtube links to the moving image work. It was nice to
share as everybody has been so thoughtful and open, supporting and enabling.
Here is a link http://www.slideshare.net/l.bicknell/seeing-is-disbelieving-with-links
initialintervention
The first intervention - trying to create a folded piece
that starts to explore the idea of restriction, tools, spaces and manipulation.
The film shows the progression of the idea, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28lAR2kSjQU&feature=youtu.be
it's a combination of intention (creating a structure that looks at the
restriction of the glove box) and 'going with' the process of folding (working
with the materials and the natural laws of their materiality). I distributed
them within the Maxwell Centre shared spaces and gave one each to the 1st years,
it is not in its finished state, the material needs to be stiffer with the box
like structure made more obvious by delineating its volume.
Saturday, 26 November 2016
youlookingatme?
a day of huge machines looking at tiny things - the
Electron microscopes are great photo opportunities. They are colossal science
fiction like machines with great names and lots of wires and knobs. They are
the stuff of old school 'real' science, enabling you to access information
about matter that is so beyond the naked imagination. Alignment is all with calibration taking time
and I was struck by the masculine nature of the language used around the
process.
you looking at me?
what are you looking at?
establishing what is wanted determines how you look.
where room stability is crucial
in stillness and silence a planet sized plinth steadies
the space
viewing an energy filter beam star like images
a focused probe
the language of imaging in a light field talk of high
angles under a dark field is oddly masculine
rough pumping the turbo, gun tilt adjustment, a chamber
core of negatives, recovering a vacuum, contrast at the expense of resolution,
optimum conditioning for imaging, beam damage and sample drift.
going back to real space there is awe
but
a
a
fear of damaging the sample by observing it.
Saturday, 19 November 2016
passingiton
Wednesday, 16 November 2016
gloveboxfetish
I
never cease to be amazed during my time at NanoDTC - the generosity of spirit I
encountered today was breathtaking - to start....clean room madness and yes I
got to have a go wearing the gloves in the box - it was so difficult to
manipulate the samples - I have seen and engaged in the tasks that are repetitive
pippet work and spin coating before but actually doing it through 3 layers of gloves
within a nitrogen pressured space whilst just sweating was another experience.
More than ever I want to try and manipulate my structures within this space.
There were some excellent 'minimal' structures created to enable currents to
flow through which will go on to inform the shapes of the devices I want to
make. The work around the hand gestures continues and I made many short videos
that I will work on later. It's obvious but each person's personality comes
through the movement as well as the content of the information conveyed. The
afternoon was the NanoDTC showcase - 30 presentations of individuals who would
like to become associates. There were some familiar faces in the audience from
the Autumn School which felt like I had some form of extended connection. It
was fascinating watching these bite sized moments of humanity, again incredibly
professional and worthy (in a good way). But - do we judge the science or the
person? What will be the best fit? I enjoyed their general commitment to making
the world a 'better' place and reflected on the practical aspects of that.
There were some good attempts and actual examples of a commitment to
communicating science to a wider community and this expansion of knowledge is
something to consider both here but also to discuss later. They will also have
to be a conduit between the wide range of students but there is a desire on
most people's part to engage with others. When you are in the presence of a
good presentation it actually lifts you, even though the full content isn't
fully understood. Presentations of knowledge transfer next - some examples of
existing projects and some that wish to be considered. Again the range of
applications is vast and worthy. I am left thinking about a comment in an
earlier practical about how to determine your PHD direction - the idea of
deciding to explore a reproducible/replicable process and that of a more 'one
off' theoretical process that might be derived from one afternoon in the lab
and the data collected in that session. There is so no right answer.
Wednesday, 9 November 2016
writingnanofolklaw
the
cleaning of surfaces that are already super smooth - ultra smooth - the concept
of a master copy - the calibration of material to specific frequencies - using
heat and light to print and more cleaning, always cleaning - the stripping of surfaces
of unwanted unknown information in preparation of the addition of the known.
Everything is considered in respect to something else.
Today I
have been thinking about extending the idea of a nanocraft into a nanofolk-law
- the act of passing on stories - every profession has its insular language -
assumed knowledge - known known's but when standing inside another world which
is outside one 's own the realisation of this is heightened - the series of practical's
are a rich time where students are exposed to the creation of words and phrases
that have in themselves been passed on - knowledge is built but where did it come from originally?
Today I was aware of the mass of chemistry - there was a 'wall of chemistry
talk' - it was wonderfully impenetrable and a joy to watch/listen to. This transmission,
this transfer of knowledge is observed in the demonstrators who run the practical's,
their urgent, constant need to find ways to communicate the ideas they are
working with. The hand gestures today were fascinating within the clean rooms
of Scalable Nanofabrication, Nanoimprint.
In electro deposition the concept of self limiting - an idea that
a material 'knows' when to stop - the actions of a material are embedded within
it and it can react no more or/and these reactions can be constructed and
defined in accordance with the wishes of the maker - calibration and
optimisation. As a child I have a dim memory of
electroplating a copper penny with 'something' all with material my Dad
'borrowed' from work! but today there was something alchemic in the dark room as
the mundane was tarnished with gold.
Tuesday, 8 November 2016
purgingtheatmosphere
graphene growth and transfer - the clean room really is a space of
possibilities - a place for the performance of science - its all about the
surface - creating new ones and using old ones with extraordinary properties -
slippage - nonstickness - stretchiness - tension - relaxing metals at high
temperatures - inert gas as spacer - the slippage of words, the idea that atoms
have choice of where to go and always framing the science into the 'real'
world. enjoying watching the craft of nanoscience, it's hands-on-ness. thinking about the scale of the graphs when monitoring and presenting evidence and how it can alter perception.
Sunday, 6 November 2016
optimisingspace
Friday's
practical - gas absorption - appeared to involve very expensive equipment that
was very fragile. Apart from the obvious (the ability through building
metal-organic frameworks to calculate the surface area of solid matter at a
very small level) my lack of ability to engage in what was happening within the
technical and expensive grey boxes meant that I started to almost start to observe
from another part of my brain - I watched the demonstrator 'explain' some of
the overarching concepts, processes and outcomes with hand gestures - I became
mesmerised by this and an idea started to manifest itself - a thought .... would
it be possible to use the hand gestures that explain scientific theories as a
way or system to manipulate or handle the objects I am going to make?
This would enable
me to explore the relationship between a thought, a gesture and the tools used
for thinking.
The
rigorous nature of optimisation is compelling - the complex relationship
between the optimised moment and the notion of the beautiful and perfect - the
unsaid notions of beauty and perfection - what makes something perfect? - Is
there an excel spreadsheet somewhere containing the formula's that I can use to
calculate this? like the use of BET isotherm to determine the surface area of a solid?
working within
stability - the spaces that are created to work in have super restrictions. The
limitations are important to enable the focus to be on material not on the
space - this space is often noisy and needs to be made to seem quieter.
the specific
methodologies around particular science activities at this level appears to be
highly complex - just the idea of how the stages in the process were developed
- from the mixing of a particular metal and linker to the machinery created to
monitor seems both incredibly focused and random (I understand that this latter
feeling is due to my lack of knowledge). the number of options seem limitless
and possibilities are afforded by the level
of knowledge of material properties - this is the key.
and afterwards.....
searching for
the right answer which appears to be found within balance - the creation of beautiful
arcs from the data by focused reduction and data manipulating/handling.
and then again
words and their meanings became filtered - my lack of understanding meant that their
meanings were translated, changed enabling a reread/rethought.
Saturday, 5 November 2016
theplaysthething
thinking about
the language of science especially about the microscope - I love that the area
where specimens are placed to observe is called the stage - there are many
parallels around the spaces created for both science and art to be acted out
and observed - the white space of the white cube feels very similar to the controlled
spaces created to make science in. here are some more specimens from that place.
Wednesday, 2 November 2016
chemicallogicofthemicrobialcommunity
todays practical was confocal
microscopy - looking at the microbial community - the dynamics of species and
their interrelationships - wow - my notes boil down to the idea of chemical
logic - there is a knowledge that a material has a functionality that at some
level is understood - this functionality is used or exploited to explore the
characteristics of that material or another material at a deeper (smaller)
level - knowledge is used to make more knowledge, a form of leverage. I was
struck by the mechanical nature of nature of the natural world.
seen under the microscope the
images were really physical, realisable in the mind as what Science looks like
- this was supported initially when creating the sample to observe by the use
of glass wear, filters and the pipette. I spent a lot of the time in my mind
translating the conversation into my world of cameras, focal length and aperture.
The idea of digital and optical focus, weighing up the various tools to decide
how to observe and measure - size versus detail. When using the 3D software to almost
freeze the material in time it was like diving through space - as ever the idea
of the gaps - the spaces in-between became interesting and that at the smallest
level it always looks like the largest - space and the universe.
I came away with the extraordinary
idea that one could extrapolate the symbiotic activity of algae and bacteria
towards a discussion around and within social science. The behaviour of
microbial ecology could be used as models for human systems of activity - government,
education, the organisation of any activity simple or complex - the art of logistics........
Wednesday, 19 October 2016
pipetpipetpipetpipetpipetpipetpipetpipetpipetpipetpipet
Wednesday's
practical......it's a real thing....DNA origami. It is quite possibly the most
exciting thing ever! where to start - you build a structure within a software
program and then after bringing together the material (DNA, staples, salts etc)
mixing, filtering and pipetting (lots of pipetting) - the material appears to 'slot into' or 'follow' the system you have set
up because of the inherent functionality or quality of base pairs bonding - I think I might understand self assembly!
there is a lot of measuring and cleaning involved and again you don't actually
appear to look at the thing - you look at material which informs you of the location of thing. I love this idea of evidence of activity. Onto an idea.......
first 'find out' the DNA sequence of a person and then create a structure through
DNA folding that in some way represents or symbolises that person - it could be
conceived as a form of portraiture.
and 2 lectures with 2
very different approaches to the delivery of information; the most relentlessly brutal informationally intense PowerPoint ever and a whiteboard of equations. 1 - the theory behind AFM - due to a previous practical I was actually able
to grasp what was occurring - surface morphology, issues around calibration, the problems associated
with the tip bluntness, decisions around pixel density, the creation of
clarity through both the choice of tools with which to examine specimens and image manipulation. 2 - bands and band
engineering appeared to be about determining what something (metal, semiconductors and insulators) was dependant on its atomic makeup (there was a lot
of maths - I think it was maths). That was about the level of my understanding but the language used was quite beautiful and
as ever when in the room it feels like an experience or world beyond the actual
subject or space is being describing. It reminds me of a poetry reading, the
language's meaning slips between the liminal boundaries of specific states, not
quite metaphor but defiantly transitional .
I am asked to conceive
of something dimensionless
looking for an
electron to achieve balance but
low energy states are filled
balancing always
balancing but systems are governed by symmetry
making and
filling gaps but looking for balance
representing
electrons in a solid but suspending is restricted
there are always empty
states above full ones and insulators restricting jumping
the electron
could be anywhere and everywhere
the wave
travelling moving and
unimpeded
we are converging
on one answer
is this possible?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)