A wonderful conversation about art around knowing what to do as there appears to be no right answer..... when
asked how do you know that it's right? I had to think about an issue that I
take for granted - the assume assumed knowledge of 'finishedness'. The answer It
just feels like it felt wrong within the empirical context of science, the
question required something more solid - the role of intention and experience
and referencing examples of previous works, both your own and others became a
part of the equation/conversation. The idea of faith and belief, of working
within one's own knowledge bank was discussed as part of both a negative and
positive part of the search for a balanced algebraic equation around when
something was art. How a well constructed argument can become the fact, how
depending who is saying it determines its truthfulness or at the very least it's
value - the role of hierarchy and doctrines circled. Of course much of this has
its parallel within the science world as I have witnessed within the practical's
when anomalies within images have been dismissed - is this the same
thing.....maybe?
No comments:
Post a Comment